#0 · Dec 31, 2004, 08:20 · onewarrior5
1.Is Steven Gibbs a con man,crazy, or is he actually speaking the truth of his invention?
2.Does the Hyperdimensional resonator actually work?Can you actually travel through time?
3.has anyone on this board experienced this because i am very curious trying this myself?
Thank you
#1 · Dec 31, 2004, 13:23 · Frank
Someone went through the motions of testing this device and, rather predictably IMO, it didn't work.
Yours,
Frank
#2 · Dec 31, 2004, 13:54 · Adun
#3 · Jan 01, 2005, 10:17 · Tombo
#4 · Jan 28, 2005, 10:01 · magtar
#5 · Jan 29, 2005, 04:18 · Potential
Anyone ever put it on another chakra besides the one mentioned. Visshudha will cause an epileptic seizure, though that was fun.
#6 · Jan 29, 2005, 16:49 · BirthOfTheNight
#7 · Jan 30, 2005, 04:08 · CaCoDeMoN
#8 · Jan 30, 2005, 14:21 · Potential
#9 · Jan 30, 2005, 17:22 · Frank
It's true though.
Yours,
Frank
#10 · Jan 30, 2005, 21:22 · pod_3
#11 · Jan 31, 2005, 03:02 · CaCoDeMoN
QuoteMaybe it could be mathematically proven that it is a set of probabilities indeed. All records of "past" exist only in current moment.
And what if the "past" is only a set of probabilities as well. Now that's really going to get people thinking, lol.
#12 · Mar 11, 2005, 16:36 · pod_3
#13 · Mar 14, 2005, 00:32 · Ybom
Ok, let me rephrase that lol. Ok, people tend to look at statistics like a shuffled deck of cards. Every time you turn over a card, it becomes easier and easier to predict what comes next. This happens sometimes, but it really doesn't describe the chaos of reality properly.
A more accurate method to describe reality would be after you turn over the top card to put it back into the deck and reshuffle before you turn over another top card. This makes the prediction much much harder.
I never said there weren't ways around all of the prediction crap though. I truly feel sorry for the psychics out there who know the future (and the 'deep' past) but cannot tell it. That has to suck.
#14 · Mar 14, 2005, 22:06 · pod_3
Quote A more accurate method to describe reality would be after you turn over the top card to put it back into the deck and reshuffle before you turn over another top card. This makes the prediction much much harder.That was my idea, exactly.
Quote The past most likely to have lead to this present had the highest degree of probability from hereYou might PM me if any one of you have experimented to the effect that not all info on these devices is published.