#0 · Aug 04, 2002, 18:26 · jilola
So can someone pleae explain to me why sex and spirituality are almost always considered mutually exclusive!!!!!
What is the big G** d**m deal!
I can see how the highly energetic state of sexual arousal can be mistaken for an amplified spritual state. But if one can make the distinction between the physical and the spiritual the point becomes pretty much moot, huh?
I'm ranting a bit here, but I've just about had it with the sexual fixtation of the spiritual community. Enlighten me someone, or saving that tell me to shut up
2cents
jouni
#1 · Aug 04, 2002, 19:00 · Tom
#2 · Aug 04, 2002, 19:15 · jilola
What's always wigged me out in the general spiritual teachings is the way in which various aspects of human nature are considered bad/dangerous/detrimental/
It's obvious at least to me, that in order to advance spiritually one needs to acknowledge all aspects of being a physical human and to incorporate them into the path.
When any part of the physical existence is neglected or suppressed we get all kinds of problems the least of which are the ones related to kundalini.
The life force or the essence of our being is inherently balanced and to try to accommodate it in an un balanced physical body is to ask for trouble. So I can't for the life of me understand why so many teachings fail to see that a balance is required kin the physical in order to have on one hand balance on the spiritual and on another change and advance.
The life force (kundalini?) is depicted as being a twofold energy, yin and yang, Ida and Pingala. Balance people, balance and harmony!
2cents
jouni
#3 · Aug 04, 2002, 21:31 · Tom
#4 · Aug 05, 2002, 05:17 · WalkerInTheWoods
#5 · Aug 24, 2002, 13:27 · Frank
Yours,
Frank
#6 · Aug 24, 2002, 14:36 · cainam_nazier
David Rogalski
cainam_nazier@hotmail.com
I am he who walks in the light but is masked by the shadows.
http://www.prepaidliving.com/vip/David127385
#7 · Aug 24, 2002, 20:21 · Tisha
Actually, I have a sneaking suspicion that this is why "modern" religion and spirituality reject the sex/spirit combination: The split is an over-reaction to the Religions of Old. They were too pagan, too earthy, too sensuous. The Old Gods, and all their traditions, needed to be demonized in favor of the New God, whose Priests and follwers needed to be pure and sexless, to differentiate themselves from the old ones. Bleah!
For good reading material on the connections between sex and spirit, Time-Life's Living Wisdom Series put out a book, titled appropriately, Sex and Spirit . It's about how sex and religion are connected . . . in fact, how ideas about sex defined religion. Complete with illustrations. Check it out!
Tisha
"As Above, So Below"
#8 · Aug 24, 2002, 22:02 · James S
A properly balanced energy system should result in normal healthy sexuality, as the Sacral chakra (responsible for most of our sexuality & sexual energy)will be properly balanced with the rest of the chakras.
For those of us that might have a more overactive libido, through awareness of your energy system, you can transfer energy from the sacral chakra to the higher energy centres, and gain benifit from that energy if you are unable to have your sexual energy expended in more "pleasurable" ways.
The flip side of this is that if you try and repress your sexual energy, as is demanded of most orthordox priests, it can throw your sacral chakra so far out of whack it can badly affect your sexuality, sexual energy, and physically affect the lower abdominal organs.
With this in mind it really is no wonder why there are so many reports of sexual abuse and paedophilia among orders of church clergy.
As Jouni pointed out, there is a real fixation among certain religious doctrines that the needs of the body should be put second to the needs of the spirit. Depending on how this is preached, and how people follow this philosophy, it can really screw up the bodies physical/energy balance, and lead to far more problems than just sexuality.
James S
- You don't choose the belief, the belief chooses you!
#9 · Aug 25, 2002, 15:41 · jilola
Tisha & James S: Yep. Sounds human to go from one POV to a diametrically opposed one without passing through the middle ground.
I don't really believe one can lose energy when doing something that is in alignment with our natural needs. I'd think that energy is expended more when trying to fight what's natural.
2cents
jouni
#10 · Aug 30, 2002, 04:36 · Winged_Wolf
For life-energy working, it's an entirely different ball of wax.
I don't think I can believe that males will have negative health effects from sex. If they don't engage in sex, they're going to have nocturnal emissions anyhow--that's what nature intended. The endorphins and the physical contact should be more than enough to make up for the minor physical/energetic losses. We know that touching and pleasure improve health.
--Winged Wolf
"I will stare at the sun until its light doesn't blind me, and I will walk into the fire, 'til its heat doesn't burn me, and I will feed the fire...."
#11 · Aug 30, 2002, 09:11 · Meg
#12 · Aug 30, 2002, 09:32 · Tisha
Tisha
"As Above, So Below"